[sldev] Metaverse platform gambling 1

[Giulio Prisco]

Why? Other metaverse platforms, and in particular those I mention,
have features that really should be in Second Life. If, that is, LL
want SL to be taken seriously as a business soriented metaverse
platform. And of course, I look fwd to seeing such features integrated
in SL - but of course that is LL's decision to make.

I can tell you that, in Europe, after a brief good press wave before
last summer, SL is not taken seriously anymore as a business tool and
most firms are more interested in other platforms. Dismissing these
concerns as "not relevant" is like that ostrich with its head stuck in
the sand in order not to see the dangerous outside world.

G.

On Feb 3, 2008 1:00 PM, Tateru Nino <tateru.nino at gmail.com> wrote:
> My comment would be...
> Let's see.
> "Not relevant to this mailing list"
> Just off the top of my head, you understand.
>
>
> Giulio Prisco wrote:
> > FYC: http://metaxlr8.net/index.php/site/metaverse_platform_gambling_1/
> >
> > Very short summary: A small consulting and development company does
> > not have the resources to follow all existing and candidate metaverse
> > platforms and can only bet on one or a very small set. At the moment
> > my preference fluctuates chaotically between OpenCroquet and the open
> > source SL wannabe clone OpenSim  (I do not know enough yet about the
> > Sun platform).
> >
> >
>
> --
> Tateru Nino
> http://www.massively.com/
>
>



-- 
Giulio Prisco
gp at metafuturing.com
metafuturing S.L.
http://metafuturing.com/
http://metaxlr8.net/
C Juan Ramón Jiménez 8-1
Complejo Eurobuilding
28036 Madrid - Spain
Phone (34) 91 18 19 147
Fax (34) 91 350 47 52
Cell (34) 610 536 144