[sldev] Sources, please ! Windlight 79185 and v1.19.0.RC1still
not published !
Henri Beauchamp
sldev at free.fr
Sat Feb 9 00:26:41 PST 2008
On Fri, 8 Feb 2008 14:00:23 -0600, Soft wrote:
> On Feb 8, 2008 11:15 AM, Henri Beauchamp <sldev at free.fr> wrote:
> > It is really hard, these days to publish alternative viewers, because
> > the sources for the released versions by LL are NOT made available.
> >
> > Please, do publish the sources for the released versions (RC and Windlight
> > as well) !
> >
> > The week-end is coming, which is the best time for us open source folks
> > to patch and compile... and I fear this week-end will be again fruitless.
> > :-(
>
> Henri, please grab the tarballes linked at the bottom of this commit message:
> https://lists.secondlife.com/pipermail/sldev-commits/2008-February/000405.html
>
> Right now, the RC branches are the only ones that get tested on all
> platforms. We're working to get QA in on testing the source drops that
> happen closest to first look releases, but we're not there yet. If
> you're tracking anything but RCs, you'll do better to watch the
> sldev-commits mailing list than the wiki page.
The problem is that with this method, I can't know what commit corresponds
to the _official_ release (official RC, official Windlight) and may end up
picking up the wrong tarballs: my alternative viewer is supposed (and so
far proved) to have less bugs than LL's, and I don't want to end up with
more bugs because I picked up the wrong commit in the SVN (either an older
one with less bug fixed or a newer one with new bugs)...
So, could you at least make a commit for each official release in each
branch (including WL and RC) and then tell us on this list and/or on the
Wiki which commit corresponds to which release, please ?
Henri.
http://sldev.free.fr/
More information about the SLDev
mailing list