[sldev] Cache speed experiment & results...

Argent Stonecutter secret.argent at gmail.com
Tue Jun 3 19:48:39 PDT 2008


On 2008-06-03, at 11:28, Soft wrote:
> The cache isn't exceptionally slow - it's the jpeg2000 decode that
> really bites here, and storing those decoded would use copious amounts
> of disk space.

I'm willing to use copious amounts of disk space. I've got 150GB  
doing nothing but SL. If it took 100 times the disk to store 1GB of  
cache decoded, I'd still have 50GB free.



More information about the SLDev mailing list