[sldev] GPL violation?

[Anders Arnholm]

On Sun, Jun 01, 2008 at 10:29:33AM -0500, Matthew Underwood wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 1, 2008 at 9:31 AM, Tony <anthonyrbundy at gmail.com> wrote:
> Under the GPL any derivative works have to release the source (they
> can charge up to the cost of the binary form tho).  So if you release
> a 3k viewer, then you could theoretically charge 3k for the source
> too, but you still have to have the source available.  Read the

But not extra un the 3K you took for the binary release, also you canät
limit your customers form selling and changing the product.

I work in the borderline berween open source (mainly GPL) and
properitary additions.

/ Balp
-- 
      o_   Anders Arnholm,
 o/  /\    anders at arnholm.se
/|_, \\    http://anders.arnholm.se/
/
`
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : http://lists.secondlife.com/pipermail/sldev/attachments/20080604/8020d68a/attachment.pgp