[sldev] Scripting projects priority survey

[Nicholas Chase]

Christian Scholz / Tao Takashi (SL) wrote:

> Sure, but still I see LSL as somewhat broken for serious applications
> and I'd rather see it become replaced by something better sooner than
> later instead of taking time to add new features to it which you might
> need to reimplement later then. So the argument is that nobody should
> be writing serious applications in LSL anyway ;-) (but everybody is
> doing it because there is no alternative)l

Tao, if we have to wait until SL's scripting is perfect before we start 
writing serious applications, we might as well pack it in and go home 
now. :)

Forgive me for making the web analogy, but I don't think that anybody 
would have envisioned today's application environment when looking at 
HTML 1.0 and early CGI, but it was those applications that pushed the 
web to what it is now.

----  Chase