[sldev] LLMozLib2 is now exclusively in the public SVN repository
Robin Cornelius
robin.cornelius at gmail.com
Mon Mar 24 14:03:16 PDT 2008
Mike Monkowski wrote:
> I decided to run Purify on the viewer to look for memory management
> problems and I found more corruption than a Bush White House.
>
> So starting from the beginning of the output, the first problem is with
> the embedded browser. I'm looking at the point release (1.19.0.5) so it
> still uses LLMozLib. I tried running Purify on the latest release
> candidate and had problems getting Purify to work with it. I don't want
> to fix problems that have already been fixed, so until I can figure out
> how to run Purify on 1.19.1.2 can I use LLMozLib2 with 1.19.0.5? Is it
> backwards compatible?
>
> Also, if I use the libraries that come with the source distribution, can
> I just build LLMozLib2 to get me the .pdb file or do I have to rebuild
> the whole mess? It looks like the 1.18.1 mozilla build isn't supported
> on VS2005.
1.19.1.X seems to have its own leaks completely separately from
1.19.0.5, i've been valgrinding but its nasty work.
I would be tempted to mask out mozlib stuff if you can, its not the
biggest problem and not the biggest leak.
mozlib1 and 2 are not *directly* compatable but i am sure with a little
fiddling its possible to make either go. Some extra parameters on
functions here and there.
You will probably have to rebuild everything to get reliable debugging
as mozlib is staticly linked along with bits of mozilla. This is another
reason why it should be a DSO like my builds.
Regards
Robin
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 252 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
Url : http://lists.secondlife.com/pipermail/sldev/attachments/20080324/f4e04bea/signature.pgp
More information about the SLDev
mailing list