[sldev] LLMozLib2 is now exclusively in the public SVN repository

Mike Monkowski monkowsk at watson.ibm.com
Tue Mar 25 08:56:55 PDT 2008


Robin Cornelius wrote:
> I would be tempted to mask out mozlib stuff if you can, its not the
> biggest problem and not the biggest leak.

I'm not looking for leaks, I'm looking for memory corruption that 
happens early in the logon process and right now it looks like the 
embedded browser is the culprit.  I'm not sure whether it's a code bug 
or the nastiness of using several version of Microsoft runtime libraries.

> mozlib1 and 2 are not *directly* compatable but i am sure with a little
> fiddling its possible to make either go. Some extra parameters on
> functions here and there.

To be clear, are you referring to llmozlib and llmozlib2 or to libraries 
that are part of mozilla?

> You will probably have to rebuild everything to get reliable debugging
> as mozlib is staticly linked along with bits of mozilla. This is another
> reason why it should be a DSO like my builds.

If I had all of the required libraries, I could get reliable debugging 
by compiling just llmozlib[2].  The question is whether the required 
libraries are included in the Linden library distributions.

And I still have the question:  Can the Mozilla libraries be build with 
VS2005 or is VS2003 required?

Mike


More information about the SLDev mailing list