[sldev] Your Feedback Wanted on Search Flagging !

[Matthew Dowd]

> However.. all in all, this is distracting from the point that some > content is against the terms of service (and also morally/legally > unacceptable). This is completely seperate from the "mature content" > flagging. If you noticed some child pornography listed, for example, > you'd probably like a method of reporting it swiftly and in an efficient > manner to the lindens.
Unfortunately it isn't quite as black and white. Whilst, clearly child pornography is prohibited content - when LL asked people to be vigilante about child pornography (partly due to the badly chosen phrase of "age play"), many got ARed for being child avatars or being called Lolita etc.. Hence I could quite imagine children clothes stores, and Gothic Lolita stores getting a relative high number of "prohibited" flags even though these are not prohibited (by people misunderstanding rather than necessarily deliberately grieffing). 
 
Matthew
_________________________________________________________________
Win Indiana Jones prizes with Live Search
http://clk.atdmt.com/UKM/go/msnnkmgl0010000002ukm/direct/01/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.secondlife.com/pipermail/sldev/attachments/20080502/9b524f0a/attachment.htm