[sldev] branches/shadow-draft missing llrender.cpp
JB Kraft
kwerks.sl at gmail.com
Wed May 28 09:54:11 PDT 2008
FWIW, though I have not collected stats mathematically, I am surprised to
ever see anything over 10fps on my machine at the recommended Mid setting.
Average seems to be about 8fps. I can barely hit 20fps on the Low setting in
an empty sim. Been that way for quite some time and I kinda figured I'd fall
off the edge of being able to be in SL at all sooner then later with this
box. 1.18 works great though.
Model Name: MacBook Pro 15"
Model Identifier: MacBookPro1,1
Processor Name: Intel Core Duo
Processor Speed: 2.16 GHz
Number Of Processors: 1
Total Number Of Cores: 2
L2 Cache: 2 MB
Memory: 2 GB
Bus Speed: 667 MHz
Chipset Model: ATY,RadeonX1600
Type: Display
Bus: PCIe
PCIe Lane Width: x16
VRAM (Total): 256 MB
Vendor: ATI (0x1002)
On Wed, May 28, 2008 at 12:37 PM, Brad Kittenbrink (Brad Linden) <
brad at lindenlab.com> wrote:
> Tateru Nino wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> Thomas Grimshaw wrote:
>>
>>> Tateru Nino wrote:
>>>
>>>> Considering how poorly SL can perform at quite a bit better than the
>>>> minimum spec, I think that 2% figure could well be achieved by people
>>>> departing in frustration. My last system was a solid gaming machine in its
>>>> day - but could barely chug along in single-digit frame-rates on minimum
>>>> settings once Windlight came along. Thank heavens for new hardware.
>>>>
>>> There's no way second life could retain its stronghold in the virtual
>>> world marketplace unless it made some progress graphically. And, no
>>> disrespect, but have you turned your graphics settings down to match the
>>> quality of the old client? Windlight can be effectively disabled. You can't
>>> expect better graphics with no performance hit.
>>>
>> Yes, I did. It did not run as well - 30% drop in framerates on that system
>> - that was my point. It pretty much killed my ability to use SL on that box.
>>
>> And I'm certainly not arguing against graphical improvements. From a
>> business standpoint they are a necessity over time.
>> _______________________________________________
>> Click here to unsubscribe or manage your list subscription:
>> /index.html
>>
>
> If a particular release degrades performance on your configuration, that is
> a bug, and should be reported with CPU/GPU/ram configuration info. Such
> bugs will be prioritized according to the severity of the degradation and
> what proportion of the resident community they affect just like all other
> bugs.
>
> It was a goal of the WindLight project to have no graphics chipset with a
> significant sample size in our databse average below 12fps on the
> recommended settings. We collected a lot of data on this during the
> firstlooks and release candidates for 1.19.1, I'll see if we can dig some of
> it up and publish it.
>
> We clearly want our target audience to be as large as possible. To do
> otherwise would be business suicide for us. Second Life should run
> reasonably on as many machines as possible. I'm particularly interested in
> under what configuration Tateru had problems. Is there an existing jira for
> this? Scott Squires' situation earlier in the thread is similarly
> interesting.
>
>
>
>
> I'd also like to respond to the following point made earlier in the thread:
>
> Matthew Dowd wrote:
>
>> I do have issue with the "if you machine is older than a few years, stop
>> being a skinflint and buy a new one" implication of the e-mail though!
>>
> Eric has responded to many of the rest of the issues in that post, but I'd
> like to add the following: There is no implication that you need to buy a
> new machine. GeForce 8[1] and Radeon R600[2] series cards are availible for
> less than $50. (I believe that the R600 series is the equivalent ATI
> product line as it claims shader model 4 support, but one of the other
> graphics devs should probably confirm that.) If you're running on a laptop
> or otherwise can't upgrade the graphics card, you should never expect to
> have the latest and greatest graphical features.
>
> -Brad
>
> [1]
> http://www.newegg.com/Product/ProductList.aspx?Submit=ENE&N=2010380048+4025+106791921
> [2]
> http://www.newegg.com/Product/ProductList.aspx?Submit=ENE&N=2010380048+4025+106792278
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Click here to unsubscribe or manage your list subscription:
> /index.html
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.secondlife.com/pipermail/sldev/attachments/20080528/b74ac978/attachment-0001.htm
More information about the SLDev
mailing list