[sldev] [SVC] Mono replaces LSL - Better Interoptibility?

[Lawson English]

Argent Stonecutter wrote:
> On 2008-09-28, at 03:37, Joshy Squashy wrote:
>> I think its fair to say this conversion to Mono is very much "under 
>> the hood"; however, as scripts run so much faster I was wondering 
>> what xml-rpc limitations still exist in Mono scripts.  If the answer 
>> is "all of them", I was wondering if there were plans to expand the 
>> xml-rpc interface or to use mono syntax/libraries.
>
>
> There have been a number of comments from Linden Labs indicating that 
> there are no current plans for adding direct access to any Mono 
> libraries or languages.
>
 From what Ted Maa has said to me, it appears that one LL long-term goal 
is to get scripting in SL   compatible with new OSS features and 
capabilities, so you can get some idea of one direction SL scripting 
will go in by looking at where OpenSim Scripting is heading. Of course, 
the opposite is also true: new LL innovations will obviously copied by 
OpenSim as well:

http://opensimulator.org/wiki/Scripting_Documentation



Lawson