[sldev] Code review for those of you with commit access

[Mike Monkowski]

Philip Rosedale wrote:
> Man Glen, you are tough!  "humor the ex-CEO"... really?  Actually I very 
> much wanted to work more on open source.  I feel like it is a huge 
> chance for greatness, but that we (as a company) need to do more to 
> support it.

Don't blame Glen.  I'm the one who suggested this was a way to humor the 
ex-CEO.  Of course I smile when I say that.  You don't think just 
because you used to be the boss that we'd cut you some slack, do you?  :-)

It does make sense, or course.  If one person can maintain the Dale 
Glass viewer, or the Nicolas viewer, or Kirsten's viewer, it must be 
possible to find one person in Linden that could maintain an alternate 
viewer.

However, no one has a problem with Dale or Nicolas or Kirsten deciding 
what they want to incorporate in their viewers.  But this won't be 
perceived as "Philip's viewer," it'll be seen as "Linden's alternate 
viewer" and hey, why can't I get my shiny new feechur in there?

I'm not clear what the criteria would be to decide who gets commit access.

Mike