[sldev] AppendedAcks
Thomas Grimshaw
tom at streamsense.net
Wed Apr 1 12:49:16 PDT 2009
Hey all,
I was just wondering if there was any practical reason why AppendedAcks
are not zerocoded in the packet data?
Saving a few bytes means fitting more Acks into each message,
potentially reducing the number of PacketAck messages being sent, which
means a potentially substantial protocol overhead reduction.
This could also be implemented with backward compatibility by using a
new flag to indicate zerocoded appendedacks.
~T
More information about the SLDev
mailing list