[sldev] VWR-10311 Enabling lip sync by default
Tammy Nowotny
TammyNowotny at mac.com
Wed Apr 22 19:29:54 PDT 2009
I have been having trouble with voice not firing up with 1.23. My
friends list is pretty long but it is less than 800, by a factor of 10.
(But that may not include avatars who have left the game and been away
for years, but whose calling card is still in my inventory and/or who I
never purged from my list.)
I have an old pre-intel Mac Mini with only 1 GB of memory.
--Tammy Nowotny
Joe Miller wrote:
> Dirk,
>
> Quite the contrary, the Linden Lab / Vivox relationship is very
> healthy and we have some interesting new features ready to roll
> shortly. There were a few issues in the SDK shipped with the 1.22
> viewer that have caused problems for some folks. One in particular
> was triggered by very large Friends Lists (800+ calling cards in
> inventory) so it would likely affect long-term residents like
> yourself. That problem (and others mentioned in the Jira you
> referenced below) should be fixed now in the 1.23RC nightly, soon to
> be RC0. If you have questions around functionality or problems with
> voice in SL, you'll have better luck seeking answers here or at Linden
> than expecting Vivox to respond. Please feel free to hit me with an
> IM or email if you have specific issues or questions you're having
> trouble getting answers to. I'll get you the answers.
>
> -- Joe
>
> Black Hat Design wrote:
>> I agree that Lip Sync be moved out of Beta. It does a fairly decent job when
>> voice actually works. Unfortunately residents are suffering many voice
>> issues now (http://jira.secondlife.com/browse/VWR-12487) and these are no
>> longer triaged as they appear to be third party issues. I have not had much
>> luck in getting answers from Vivox on the issues currently plaguing SL
>> residents. I am led to believe that the issue is arising out of a conflict
>> with the new SDK which was introduced in RC9 of the current release running
>> alongside the old SDK which many residents are still running since there is
>> no mandatory update to the viewer at this time.
>>
>> Currently, if you want stable voice, you can run the old client and suffer
>> through many of the bugs that are fixed in the current version, or you can
>> run the new client and go back to using Skype and a stream for inworld
>> conferences.
>>
>> Being that Vivox has not been responsive to inquiries, I am curious as to
>> whether there has been some deterioration in the relationship between Linden
>> Lab and Vivox.
>>
>> Dirk Talamasca
>> dirk at dirktalamasca.com
>>
>> Skype: Dirk Talamasca
>> Yahoo: blackhat
>> AIM: Black Hat Design
>> Google: dirktalamasca at gmail.com
>>
>> Edited subject.
>>
>> There's enough information to display green waves of appropriate
>> intensity above each speaking avatar. That same information can't be
>> used to control which avatars move their mouths?
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 11:01 AM, Kakurady Drakenar <kakurady at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> It doesn't do what it's supposed to do, that is accurate lip-synching for
>>> all avatars. All it does is babbling for your own avatar, and all other
>>> avatars at the same time when even only one of them talks, because of the
>>> limitations of Vivox's voice architecture.
>>>
>>> Now, if there's a way to have user aware of that caveat, I have nothing
>>>
>> else
>>
>>> to worry on this issue.
>>>
>>> GCat/Kakur
>>>
>>> (To Moriz: Sorry for the duplicate, I forgot to choose "reply to all".)
>>>
>>> On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 11:40 AM, Moriz Gupte <moriz.gupte at gmail.com>
>>>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>> I also vote for taking lipsynch out of beta. I use it all the time but
>>>> have to waste some time telling new users how to enable it. extremely low
>>>> client side CPU footprint + does what it is supposed to, no reason not to
>>>> move it out of beta IMHO.
>>>> R
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 9:24 AM, Mike Monkowski <monkowsk at watson.ibm.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I'd like to see http://jira.secondlife.com/browse/VWR-10311 implemented.
>>>>> It's a trivial change. If it requires any shepherding, I'll do it. I
>>>>> think it would be appropriate for an "open source" viewer.
>>>>>
>>>>> Mike
>>>>> Mm Alder
>>>>>
>>>>> Rob Lanphier wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> So, are there other patches in JIRA that seem worthy of making it in
>>>>>> before the first merge window, and are there volunteers to shepherd
>>>>>> those patches through?
>>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Policies and (un)subscribe information available here:
>> http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/SLDev
>> Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges
>>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Policies and (un)subscribe information available here:
> http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/SLDev
> Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.secondlife.com/pipermail/sldev/attachments/20090422/510a2af7/attachment.htm
More information about the SLDev
mailing list