[sldev] 3rd party viewer policy post on blogs.secondlife.com

[Gigs]

Domino Marama wrote:
> The only option I can see which would balance my needs as a "build only
> viewer" developer and content security issues is if there was an
> alternative login / api option which would only supply the content that
> I was allowed to take offline for editing.

There's an RFC about this:
http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3514