[sldev] 3rd party viewer policy post on blogs.secondlife.com

[Anders Arnholm]

On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 09:39:06AM -0400, Lear Cale wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 7:35 AM, Robin Cornelius <robin.cornelius at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> 
>     The closest this type of security (shared private key) has to working
>     is when the secret is embedded in security ASICs and even this is not
>     completely secure.
>  
> Right -- there are really two issues here:
>  
> 1) Is it technically feasible at all?

The short answer is No...

So many times have why been tried to explanined to the "Content
Creators"(*) i sometimes think it's time to requext them needing to
handeld before that cause more damage.

> Until I hear a good answer for item #1, the rest is noise.

There is a good answer on Item #1, some people refuse to accept this
as the answer is nopt what they like to hear. Then they start to find
other variants of item #1 to make an effort to make something:

(*) With content creators here i mean the small vocal group, that could
    be exemplified by the once in court case with LL for not inveting
    magic.

-- 
      o_   Anders Arnholm,
 o/  /\    anders at arnholm.se
/|_, \\    http://anders.arnholm.se/
/
`
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : http://lists.secondlife.com/pipermail/sldev/attachments/20091021/85054b21/attachment.pgp