[sldev] Sharing edit permissions of a script - without the need to transfer ownership first. Please comment

Nexii Malthus nexiim at googlemail.com
Thu Sep 10 23:51:51 PDT 2009


Modifiy rights should be exactly that, if the script is full perm and the
object as well. You should have, you know, the rights to modification if
that individual has given those permissions.

I doubt LL would ever bother fixing the bug. They'd call it by design. There
are a lot of situations I have come across where I wished to edit a script I
was working on in a friends' build. Instead i have to drag the script into
my inventory, modify and replace.

- Nexii

On Sun, Aug 23, 2009 at 12:07 PM, Aleric Inglewood <
aleric.inglewood at gmail.com> wrote:

> Well, at least all this led to an update of the page
>
> https://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/Editing_someone_else%27s_scripts_and_notecards
>
> Remaining questions:
>
>    *  Isn't it a bug that the requirement to first set the group and
> then set 'share with group'
>      and not the other way around, exists?
>    * Shouldn't a script be also editable if it has 'Allow anyone to
> copy" set (as opposed
>      to 'share with with group'?)
>    * Shouldn't one be able to edit scripts of someone else if one has
> that someone else's
>      build permissions and the script has Next Owner can 'Modify /
> Copy (/ Transfer, whatever)'
>      set (indicating the intent of being full perm / open source).
>
> On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 3:02 PM, Aleric
> Inglewood<aleric.inglewood at gmail.com> wrote:
> > http://jira.secondlife.com/browse/SVC-316
> _______________________________________________
> Policies and (un)subscribe information available here:
> http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/SLDev
> Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting
> privileges
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.secondlife.com/pipermail/sldev/attachments/20090911/7a93ffe9/attachment.htm 


More information about the SLDev mailing list