[sldev] LL already uses squid? (Re: How many chars can...)
Tateru Nino
tateru.nino at gmail.com
Wed Sep 16 06:14:03 PDT 2009
Presumably after a lot more stuff migrates to HTTP, I'd guess. It'd be a
good use-case for a new cache-control directive, mind. I don't think
'cache-control: private' would quite satisfy needs.
Dale Mahalko wrote:
> Wait wait, LL is already using squid internally? And I've been asking
> for organizational/school/business proxy-caching of SL for years and
> I've heard nothing of this?
>
> At the K-12 public school districts where I work, we are STILL limited
> to using 3 megabit for 75 staff and some 200 student computers all at
> the same time. Without organizational proxy-caching there's no way SL
> will ever work in cash-strapped education classrooms.
>
> So how long until LL finally implements squid proxy-cache support on
> the client side, with Snowglobe and HTTP-texture?
>
> - Dale Mahalko / Scalar Tardis
>
>
>
> On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 11:07 PM, Tateru Nino <tateru.nino at gmail.com
> <mailto:tateru.nino at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> RFC2616 doesn't impose any particular restriction, but intermediate
> software might. Last I looked, the Lab was using squid to handle...
> well, quite a lot of things, including this.
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Policies and (un)subscribe information available here:
> http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/SLDev
> Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges
--
Tateru Nino
http://dwellonit.taterunino.net/
More information about the SLDev
mailing list