[opensource-dev] Wiki posting: Open Source Repository Strategy

[Kent Quirk (Q Linden)]

At this point, our internal branches still contain proprietary libraries and parts of our server code. We have to have an explicit export process to block that. We have a team working on "source code splitup" to finish the separation of our systems into libraries, and when that's finished I believe we'll be able to do it all with hg. 


On Mar 22, 2010, at 8:11 AM, Aleric Inglewood wrote:

> *confused* I thought that we were going to use hg, so that
> commits made internally can be easilly and frequently
> pushed to a public repository. Is that "viewer-public"?
>  
> Then why is there is there still a "viewer-external"
> using SVN? That kinda defeats the purpose of hg?
>  
> I thought, and think, that snowglobe development
> should also be done with hg, so we can have all
> the benefits of having local repositories and
> experimental branches to developer and test patches.
> 
> 
> On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 4:38 AM, Kent Quirk (Q Linden) <q at lindenlab.com> wrote:
> Hi, all. I've created a draft of our repository strategy for how we will be handling open development branches at LL, and posted an annotated diagram on the wiki.
> 
>        https://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/Linden_Lab_Repository_Strategy
> 
> Questions and constructive commentary are encouraged. Since it's policy we intend to follow, please edit only for clarity. If it needs substantive tweaking, please let us do it.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
>        Q
> _______________________________________________
> Policies and (un)subscribe information available here:
> http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev
> Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges
> 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.secondlife.com/pipermail/opensource-dev/attachments/20100322/1a979259/attachment.htm