[sldev] Fresh new code: eventlet and mulib

John Hurliman jhurliman at wsu.edu
Tue Aug 28 17:31:41 PDT 2007


Ryan Williams (Which) wrote:
> I asked some questions in the previous email, but I don't think they
> were very well communicated because no one responded, let's try again.
>
> The main question is: how closely do we want to associate eventlet and
> mulib development with viewer development?
>
> --- Should we have a separate mailing list(s) for them?
>   Currently I think "no" because there's no noise problem on sldev, and
> we don't have a community of web devs contributing to eventlet and mulib
> but not to the viewer (though I expect/hope this will happen at some point).
> --- Should we track bugs in PJIRA, or in Trac?
> --- Should we put the documentation on wiki.sl.com, or in Trac?
>   It's really tempting to make the Trac for each project be the one-stop
> shop for all relevant information.  It's how I'd do it if I were
> starting these from scratch.  But we do have all this existing
> infrastructure for bug tracking and documentation.  My inclination is to
> continue documenting on wiki.sl.com, because I prefer MediaWiki, and
> track bugs in Trac (because things get too easily lost in JIRA, plus
> it's heck of slow).
>
> Thoughts?
>
> -RYaN
>
> P.S. Sorry there hasn't been more developing on these lately -- I've
> been sick.

I vote for wiki.sl.com and JIRA. JIRA categories can be made for each 
project which makes it easy to filter and track based on what you are 
looking for, and the wiki is already being touted as the "one stop 
solution" for documentation about everything SL. Plus, I'm told 
documentation on the SL wiki is license compatible with being reframed 
in to documents that can be submitted as a standard due to the 
contribution agreements.

Also, this mailing list seems like a fine place.

John


More information about the SLDev mailing list