[sldev] Can I include source licensed under the 3-clause BSD?

[Dale Glass]

On Mon, Jul 23, 2007 at 01:35:13PM +0200, Nicholaz Beresford wrote:
> 
> Dunno if there's something more suitable in the LLStrings
> or std::string ... like easy splitting into tokens or similar.
> 
> But my point is that with a task as simple as that (not eving
> having to parse a string month), inserting BSD license code
> would be the bigger hassle.
> 
> Just my two L$ worth of opinion thouth.

Sure, that works, but it's a bit specific. Since AFAIK, the standard
viewer doesn't try to interpret it anywhere, LL is quite free to
suddenly decide to send the month as a string, or something of that 
sort.

Then, LLSD seems to have date support, they probably should be using
that instead.


Also, if anybody from LL is reading this, I'd still like to know if
3-BSD code would be accepted. BSD being what it is (especially the
version without the advertising clause) I assume that using it should
involve very minimal hassle.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.secondlife.com/pipermail/sldev/attachments/20070723/465a51ee/attachment.pgp