[sldev] [META] "Sandbox:" namespace on the wiki? (and SVN)

[Dzonatas]

Lawson English wrote:
> My own impression, talking to stakeholders in the AWG who don't work 
> for Linden Labs, is that a "sandbox" namespace doesn't make sense and 
> is somewhat offensive. If something isn't READY for the AWG, it 
> remains in the AW Groupies name space with "draft" attached. If 
> something doesn't FIT with the AWG, but might be useful in the long 
> run, it still remains in the AW Groupies name space, but gets "draft" 
> removed from the name/body of the article when it becomes mature.

These are actually some ideas that have been kicked around for awhile. 
The sandbox (wiki and svn) is something that would cover a much larger 
scope than just the AWG.

I don't know if you have noticed, but there is some progress to move 
more of the viewer and network work that LL does internally to more 
external resources. I don't think there has been any posted time frame, 
but the sandbox areas may play a role in the effort.

Again, there has been some inertia on this kind of progress, and it is 
nice to see it continue to evolve.


-- 
Power to Change the Void