[sldev] Re: New Sculpty Features

[Jason Giglio]

Jacek Antonelli wrote:
> I do think that Y and Z would be good to have -- even if the effect
> can be achieved through other, less approachable methods. The majority
> of sculpty users are _artists and designers_, not mathematicians or
> comp sci geeks. They don't know (and aren't interested in learning)
> the mathematical voodoo behind all this, they just want to get the
> effect they're looking for. So, adding Y and Z would be a big win in
> usability and user-friendliness. :-)

That seems like a total non-sequitur to me.  Adding seemingly redundant
operations with technical differences that matter little to the average
artist/designer will just confuse them.

I'm with Karl, I'm not seeing a compelling case for anything other than
the invert.

-Jason
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 3266 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Url : http://lists.secondlife.com/pipermail/sldev/attachments/20080716/27ceeb61/smime.bin