[sldev] Fixed Internally resolution.

Matthew Dowd matthew.dowd at hotmail.co.uk
Fri Jul 25 01:44:59 PDT 2008


Is it possible to (easily) distinguish between a "fixed pending" which is in the RC cycle, and a "fixed pending" which is still in some internal branch yet to be folded into the RC cycle at some  as yet undecided stage? Matthew> Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2008 15:54:44 -0700> From: ramzi at lindenlab.com> To: monkowsk at watson.ibm.com> Subject: Re: [sldev] Fixed Internally resolution.> CC: sldev at lists.secondlife.com; rdw at lindenlab.com> > Yes, it's probably not being applied well uniformly.  Another wrinkle is > that the reporter may Resolve/Close the issue of their own accord, the > very moment that a fix appears in an RC build.  (Mike- I think this > explains much of that number.)> > 1. My operative has been to set the status as (still) "Fixed Pending" > while the fix is propagating through the RC cycle.  (Depending on the > person changing it, only some of these have their 'Fix Version' is set too.)> 2. When the bug fix appears in an official viewer (to ALL residents), > its status can be moved to "Fixed."  (And if it has no Fix Version at > this point, I'm sure to set it then.)> > With the official release of viewer 1.20 today, it was on my list to > move Fixed Pending->Fixed for the tasks in the 1.20 release notes.  I > just accomplished this, but the delta was only 28 issues from their > status as of this morning... So I  may not have made such a big dent in > the number Jason mentions at the top of the thread.> -Ramzi> > > Mike Monkowski wrote:> > I don't think that's being done uniformly.  There are 166 VWR bugs > > with Fix Version "1.20 Release Candidate".  Only six of those have > > Status "Fix Pending".> >> > Mike> >> >> > Ryan Williams (Which) wrote:> >> Jason Giglio wrote:> >>> >>> "Fixed Internally" number is ballooning again. Is there a process to> >>> reconcile shipped code?> >>>> >>> Is code that is released in a RC branch considered fixed, or fixed> >>> internally? > >>> >> I've been treating RC as fixed internally.  Perhaps that's wrong?> > _> > _______________________________________________> Policies and (un)subscribe information available here:> http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/SLDev> Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges
_________________________________________________________________
100’s of Nikon cameras to be won with Live Search
http://clk.atdmt.com/UKM/go/101719808/direct/01/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.secondlife.com/pipermail/sldev/attachments/20080725/e2e4348d/attachment.htm


More information about the SLDev mailing list